Re: XLink 1.1: 5.4 "URI reference" unclear

Webb Roberts wrote:
> 
> On 1/25/2006 Grosso, Paul wrote:
>> The XML Core WG reconsidered the issue and had consensus to
>> stick with the better-known term "relative URI".  
> 
> Is there a normative definition available for "relative URI"?  It seems 
> that it was defined in RFC 2396, which is explicitly obsoleted by RFC 
> 3986.  It would seem preferrable to go with the term "relative reference 
> to a URI" as defined in RFC 3986.
> ...

+1.

The term is obsoleted, so please use what RFC3986 does.

Best regards, Julian

Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 20:34:29 UTC