- From: Henry S. Thompson <ht@inf.ed.ac.uk>
- Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:07:29 +0000
- To: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>, www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Bjoern Hoehrmann writes: > I could not find a requirement in XLink 1.1 that corresponds to this. > Is XLink 1.1 not in line with the Architecture of the World Wide Web? Of course the WG aims to comply with WebArch. We just don't think this is a WebArch issue. XLink is a spec which relies on conformant implementations of RFCs it references. XLink _itself_ is not an implementation of 3986. We have chosen not to incorporate by reference 3986's grammar for URIs, but any conformant implementation of 3986, i.e. the URI/http library _used_ by an XLink implementation, should of course conform to WebArch in this regard, and not, for example, recover silently from syntax. So we don't propose any further changes in this area, beyond the one Norm already committed to early in this thread. Please let us know if you wish for us to record your formal objection with respect to this issue when we request CR status, or whether you can live with the text as Norm proposed to modify it. ht - -- Henry S. Thompson, HCRC Language Technology Group, University of Edinburgh Half-time member of W3C Team 2 Buccleuch Place, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, SCOTLAND -- (44) 131 650-4440 Fax: (44) 131 650-4587, e-mail: ht@inf.ed.ac.uk URL: http://www.ltg.ed.ac.uk/~ht/ [mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFD17BRkjnJixAXWBoRAo5QAJ4ltnOkXAvuRWu1PpUjQZ3qjaeqRQCfUDxZ 3LExlDlz1G2QT9nFPiIFmKs= =k6R1 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Received on Wednesday, 25 January 2006 17:38:16 UTC