- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 22:23:27 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
* Norman Walsh wrote: >| XML 1.2/2.0 documents, > >Why should XLink make more explicit reference to this possibility than >other specifications that use XML? Evolution. >| documents >| that violate MUST requirements in XML 1.0 without causing fatal errors, > >Are there any? Yes. >No, I don't think it would, but the Core WG couldn't really tell what >your question was. I want "Any linkbase specified as the ending resource of an arc with this special value must be an XML document" to be rephrased such that I can easily derive an algorithm from the definition that would tell whether some XLink markup meets the constraint, e.g. to add support for XLink 1.1 to the W3C Markup Validator. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 21:22:44 UTC