- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2006 21:52:02 +0100
- To: Norman Walsh <Norman.Walsh@Sun.COM>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
* Norman Walsh wrote: >I see your point. Would the following change address your concern: > >Replace: > > For locators into XML resources, the format of the fragment > identifier (if any) used within the URI reference is specified by > the XPointer specification [XPTR]. > >With: > > If a locator includes a fragment identifer, the syntax of the > fragment identifier is defined by the media type of the > representation returned when the locator is dereferenced. For > locators into XML resources (that is, resources with the media type > "application/xml" or media types that defer to the fragment > identifier syntax of "application/xml" media), the syntax of the > fragment identifier is expected to be defined by the successor to > RFC 3023. Technically, there is no fragment identifier syntax for > XML resources at the time of this writing, though the XPointer > framework and element schemes are explicitly supported by several > XML vocabularies. This is better; I don't think it's a good idea to include this here but it addresses my original concern. Thanks. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 23 January 2006 20:51:19 UTC