www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org from October to December 2005 by date

Friday, 16 December 2005

• Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Animation Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Xlink vs "legacy" linking Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Security Considerations Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: default xmlns attribute values Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: XLink 1.1 in XML 1.1 Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: xlink:href requirements Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: "URI reference" "checking" Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: XML Base confusion Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: "XML document" undefined Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: "markup conformance testing" Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: RFC 2119 conformance Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Charmod conformance Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? Norman Walsh

Wednesday, 14 December 2005

• Re: XLink 1.1: XPointer reference Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling Anne van Kesteren
• Re: I just want to use a link! What now? Norman Walsh
• Re: Good start - but simplify the system !!! Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling Norman Walsh

Saturday, 3 December 2005

• Good start - but simplify the system !!! IwanUswak@gmx.de

Tuesday, 22 November 2005

• Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling Bjoern Hoehrmann

Tuesday, 8 November 2005

• Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1 harmonization with RDF Norman Walsh

Monday, 7 November 2005

• Re: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 Binding) from the i18n core wg Felix Sasaki

Friday, 4 November 2005

• RE: Comments on WSDL 2.0 (Core, Adjuncts, Soap 1.1 Binding) from the i18n core wg Martin Duerst

Monday, 31 October 2005

• Re: Comments from the I18N Core WG on XLink 1.1 Martin Duerst

Friday, 28 October 2005

• Re: Comments from the I18N Core WG on XLink 1.1 Martin Duerst

Thursday, 27 October 2005

• Re: Comments from the I18N Core WG on XLink 1.1 Felix Sasaki

Sunday, 23 October 2005

• Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC Mark Baker

Friday, 21 October 2005

• Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? Henry S. Thompson

Thursday, 20 October 2005

• Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? Anne van Kesteren
• Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? George Chavchanidze

Wednesday, 19 October 2005

• [closed] Re: XLink 1.1: http://www.w3.org/2001/xml.xsd import Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? Henry S. Thompson
• Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC Norman Walsh

Thursday, 13 October 2005

• Re: I just want to use a link! What now? Simon St.Laurent

Wednesday, 12 October 2005

• I just want to use a link! What now? Jim Owens
• Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS Ian Hickson
• Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS Bert Bos
• Re: XLink 1.1: Integration with CSS Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: XLink 1.1 in XML 1.1 Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Error handling Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Security Considerations Norman Walsh
• Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC Mark Baker
• Re: Comments from the I18N Core WG on XLink 1.1 Felix Sasaki

Tuesday, 11 October 2005

• Re: [xlink11] integration with existing markup Anne van Kesteren
• Re: CDF WG comments on XLink 1.1 LC Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Xlink vs "legacy" linking Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: Comments from the I18N Core WG on XLink 1.1 Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: Base URI of a processing instruction Norman Walsh
• Re: [xlink11] integration with existing markup Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: xlink:href requirements Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: "markup conformance testing" Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: XPointer reference Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: Xlink vs "legacy" linking Norman Walsh
• [closed] Re: XLink 1.1: 5.2 example incorrect Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: RFC 2119 conformance Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: XPointer reference Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Charmod conformance Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? Simon St.Laurent
• Re: XLink 1.1: "XML document" undefined Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? Bjoern Hoehrmann
• Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? Norman Walsh
• Re: XLink 1.1: Open issues? Norman Walsh
• [spam] Re: your advertizing is not as good as it could be Norman Walsh

Last message date: Friday, 16 December 2005 20:56:14 UTC