- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:21:11 -0500
- To: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
I'm not sure who I expect to answer, but here goes. Did we mean for the Framework spec to allow for a shorthand (aka barename) along with more schemes? I would have thought so. In particular, suppose we want to point to element(foo/1/3) but fall back to just pointing to the element with id=foo if the element scheme isn't supported. I'd expect to write something like: href="mydoc.xml#foo element(foo/1/3)" But reading the BNF at [1], it looks to me like Pointer can be either a Shorthand or SchemeBased, but not both, and SchemeBased consists of PointerParts that each require a SchemeName, so I don't see how what I show above can be allowed by this grammar. [No, I don't want to go anywhere near the xpointer scheme, so that is not an answer for me.] paul [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/xptr-framework/#syntax
Received on Tuesday, 15 April 2003 17:27:25 UTC