- From: Erik Wilde <net.dret@dret.net>
- Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2002 19:55:43 +0100
- To: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
hello.
i think that the first sentence of http://www.w3.org/TR/xlink/#N899
should read
"Definition: A local resource is an XML element that participates in a
link by virtue of having as its *ancestor*, or being itself, a linking
element. "
rather than
"Definition: A local resource is an XML element that participates in a
link by virtue of having as its *parent*, or being itself, a linking
element. "
however, as i understand it, it would also be possible to keep the
definition at it is and let the "local resource" being non-recursive.
but if this was the original idea, why is the "having as its parent"
part in there? maybe i am misunderstanding something here...
cheers,
erik wilde - tel:+41-1-6325132 - fax:+41-1-6321035
mailto:net.dret@dret.net - http://dret.net/
computer engineering and networks laboratory
swiss federal institute of technology (eth)
* try not. do, or do not. there is no try. *
Received on Thursday, 14 November 2002 01:51:40 UTC