- From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2001 01:03:40 +0200
- To: "Sean B. Palmer" <sean@mysterylights.com>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
On Wed, Jun 27, 2001 at 11:46:00PM +0100, Sean B. Palmer wrote: > Erratum:- > > The "This Version" link on the recommendation reads:- > > http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/REC-xlink-20010627/ > > i.e. a "2000" address, but links to (the correct location):- Dohhh ! Well let's call this an easter eggs, the link is still good, and W3C usually don't change resources published in TR, next update :-\ > http://www.w3.org/TR/2001/REC-xlink-20010627/ > > Congratulations:- > > It's always wonderful to see a technology that is so fundamentally > useful go to recommendation; well done. Now it's time for (more) > implementations, so that no longer do we have to put up with > proprietary linking technologies! thanks, yes more implementations are probably what will decide the adoption rate (chicken and egg...), especially for advanced forms of linking. Simple links are really easy to add on existing framework (Mozilla/Amaya implements them already I think). Daniel -- Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/ veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/ http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/ Sep 17-18 2001 Brussels Red Hat TechWorld http://www.redhat-techworld.com
Received on Wednesday, 27 June 2001 19:03:46 UTC