- From: Steven J. DeRose <Steven_DeRose@Brown.edu>
- Date: Fri, 4 May 2001 09:09:12 -0400
- To: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org
I find the 'minority opinion' piece objectionable because it makes several clearly false claims, as well as including several proposals and pleas rather than limiting itself to expressing opinion or position. I thus believe it is necessary for the WG to issue a majority rationale statement, lest inaccurate and misleading statements be accepted for lack of less partisan information. -- Steven_DeRose@Brown.edu; http://www.stg.brown.edu/~sjd Chief Scientist, Brown Univ. Scholarly Technology Group Adjunct Associate Professor, Computer Science
Received on Saturday, 5 May 2001 03:19:32 UTC