Saturday, 30 September 2000
Friday, 29 September 2000
- I would like to ask your permission
- Minor typo in XLink spec section 5.6.2
- Re: XLink query syntax
- HOT NEW BIOTECH COMPANY IN BARRONS THIS WEEK!!
Thursday, 28 September 2000
Wednesday, 27 September 2000
- Schwangerschaft bei Big Brother?
- Porche Boxter or Luxury Cruise Earn $$$ In Days This Works!!!
- AdvertExpress - the UK's largest advertising marketplace
- Actualidad empresarial (c553)
Tuesday, 26 September 2000
Monday, 25 September 2000
Sunday, 24 September 2000
Thursday, 21 September 2000
- READRITE FORMS FIBER OPTICS COMPANY!!!!!!!
- Re: XML hack article
- XML hack article
- Re: CR exit criteria for XLink/Schema imposed by XHTML/SMIL
- Re: CR exit criteria for XLink/Schema imposed by XHTML/SMIL
- Re: CR exit criteria for XLink/Schema imposed by XHTML/SMIL
- Re: CR exit criteria for XLink/Schema imposed by XHTML/SMIL
Wednesday, 20 September 2000
Thursday, 21 September 2000
Wednesday, 20 September 2000
- searching for an xpointer implementation
- READRITE FORMS FIBER OPTICS COMPANY!!!!!!!
- Re: CR exit criteria for XLink/Schema imposed by XHTML/SMIL
- Re: CR exit criteria for XLink/Schema imposed by XHTML/SMIL
Tuesday, 19 September 2000
- Comments on XLink and XPointer from joint Linking/XSL task force
- CR exit criteria for XLink/Schema imposed by XHTML/SMIL
Monday, 18 September 2000
- READRITE FORMS FIBER OPTICS COMPANY!!!!!!!
- [www-xml-linking-comments] <none>
- Re: Comments on XPointer 1.0 CR
Sunday, 17 September 2000
Saturday, 16 September 2000
Thursday, 14 September 2000
Wednesday, 13 September 2000
- minor comments for CR-xmlbase-20000908
- RE: Comments on XPointer 1.0 CR
- RE: Comments on XPointer 1.0 CR
Tuesday, 12 September 2000
- Re: Comments on XPointer 1.0 CR
- Re: Comments on XPointer 1.0 CR
- Re: Validation of documents using internal XLinks [Was:] Dependency of XPointers upon DTD
- Cars Cars Cars
Monday, 11 September 2000
Friday, 8 September 2000
- Re: Validation of documents using internal XLinks [Was:] Dependency of XPointers upon DTD
- Re: Validation of documents using internal XLinks [Was:] Dependency of XPointers upon DTD
- Re: Using ATTLIST to simplify the authoring of XLinks [Was: Dependency of XPointers upon DTD]
- [www-xml-linking-comments] <none>
- More comments on XPointer CR
- Validation of documents using internal XLinks [Was:] Dependency of XPointers upon DTD
- Using ATTLIST to simplify the authoring of XLinks [Was: Dependency of XPointers upon DTD]
- Re: Dependency of XPointers upon DTD
- [www-xml-linking-comments] <none>
Thursday, 7 September 2000
Wednesday, 6 September 2000
- [www-xml-linking-comments] <none>
- Re: Dependency of XPointers upon DTD
- [www-xml-linking-comments] <none>
Tuesday, 5 September 2000
- Ll関ate el house a casa
- Fwd: Corrections to i18n URI text
- Re: xlink help please
- [www-xml-linking-comments] <none>
- please align wording on URI escaping
Monday, 4 September 2000
Tuesday, 5 September 2000
Monday, 4 September 2000
Sunday, 3 September 2000
Friday, 1 September 2000
- Re: Validating Link/XPointer local 'bare names'.
- Validating Link/XPointer local 'bare names'.
- Dependency of XPointers upon DTD
Thursday, 31 August 2000
- Website Optimization.net top search engine ranking
- Website Optimization.net top search engine ranking
Thursday, 24 August 2000
Wednesday, 23 August 2000
Thursday, 24 August 2000
Monday, 21 August 2000
Sunday, 20 August 2000
Monday, 14 August 2000
Saturday, 12 August 2000
Friday, 11 August 2000
Wednesday, 9 August 2000
Tuesday, 8 August 2000
Saturday, 5 August 2000
Thursday, 3 August 2000
- Re: XML Base and URI fragments
- XML Base and URI fragments
- Eduardo Haro Tecglen y Chano Dom韓guez en elcultural.com
Tuesday, 1 August 2000
Sunday, 30 July 2000
Saturday, 29 July 2000
- Re: From Lorraine,as promised,I can lower your bill
- Trade Show Exhibits: How much are you paying for "free" design?
Friday, 28 July 2000
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- Re: XML Base comment
- RE: Possible solution for XML Base problem
- Possible solution for XML Base problem
Thursday, 27 July 2000
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- Re: XML Base conformance
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- RE: DSig comments on XML Base
- XML Base conformance
Wednesday, 26 July 2000
Tuesday, 25 July 2000
Friday, 21 July 2000
Thursday, 20 July 2000
Wednesday, 19 July 2000
Tuesday, 18 July 2000
Monday, 17 July 2000
Sunday, 16 July 2000
- Links2Go "Xml" Award
- 5.4.3 correction: misdeclarations of start-point and end-point
- Bad links in XPoint CR spec
Saturday, 15 July 2000
- RE: xlxp-dev: Resources or local resources?
- Hello, read this message carefully, please, don't delete it !!!
- Hello, read this message carefully, please, don't delete it !!!
Friday, 14 July 2000
- Re: Relative URI's in xml:base
- Re: issue with relative URIs in the DOM
- Relative URI's in xml:base
- Re: issue with relative URIs in the DOM
- Presentaci贸n del Portal.
- Re: issue with relative URIs in the DOM
- Re: issue with relative URIs in the DOM
- RE: xlxp-dev: Resources or local resources?
Thursday, 13 July 2000
- re: base and external entities/resolving relative URI's in external enties
- Re: Locating LinkBase
- re: base and external entities/resolving relative URI's in external enties
Wednesday, 12 July 2000
- Re: base and external entities [was: Last call comments on XML Base]
- Re: Latest XLink Candidate Recommendation
- Re: Resources or local resources?
- Re: Latest XLink Candidate Recommendation
- Locating LinkBase
- Resources or local resources?
- RE: Last call comments on XML Base
- Re: XML Base for relative URIs: Interpretation of 5.1 of RFC 2396
- Re: XML Base for relative URIs: Interpretation of 5.1 of RFC 2396
Tuesday, 11 July 2000
- Re: XML Base for relative URIs: Interpretation of 5.1 of RFC 2396
- Re: XML Base for relative URIs: Interpretation of 5.1 of RFC 2396
- Re: XML Base for relative URIs: Interpretation of 5.1 of RFC 2396
- Re: XML Base for relative URIs: Interpretation of 5.1 of RFC 2396
- Re: Latest XLink Candidate Recommendation
- RE: Last call comments on XML Base
- Re: XML Base for relative URIs: Interpretation of 5.1 of RFC 2396
- RE: Last call comments on XML Base
- Re: Title elements
- Re: role vs. arcrole
- Re: XML Base for relative URIs: Interpretation of 5.1 of RFC 2396
- RE: Last call comments on XML Base
- XML Base for relative URIs: Interpretation of 5.1 of RFC 2396
- XML C14N and XML Base
- RE: Last call comments on XML Base
- Re: Crosshatch in XPointer, XLink (was Last call comments on XML Base)
- Title elements
- role vs. arcrole
Monday, 10 July 2000
- RE: Last call comments on XML Base
- Crosshatch in XPointer, XLink (was Last call comments on XML Bas e)
- Re: HTML WG comment on XML Base
- Enter Me
Friday, 7 July 2000
- Fwd: XML POinter Language Version 1 (June 7th, 2000)
- RE: SYMM WG comments on XBase 2nd last call
- Re: SYMM WG comments on XBase 2nd last call
- RE: SYMM WG comments on XBase 2nd last call
- Re: SYMM WG comments on XBase 2nd last call
- RE: SYMM WG comments on XBase 2nd last call
- Re: SYMM WG comments on XBase 2nd last call
Thursday, 6 July 2000
- Simulation of Simple Link with Extended Link
- Re: SYMM WG comments on XBase 2nd last call
- RE: SYMM WG comments on XBase 2nd last call
- Re: XLink 20000703 REC
- Re: XLink 20000703 REC
- URI references in semantic attributes
- minor comments for CR-xlink-20000703
Wednesday, 5 July 2000
- RE: SYMM WG comments on XBase 2nd last call
- XMLink Specification - Introduction
- Re: SYMM WG comments on XBase 2nd last call
- Re: HTML WG comment on XML Base
- RE: SYMM WG comments on XBase 2nd last call
- RE: SYMM WG comments on XBase 2nd last call
- HTML WG comment on XML Base