- From: Lance Otis <lanceo@mail.apptechsys.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Jun 2000 09:43:04 -0700
- To: <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>
J. Marsh suggests I send this to you. Is this the right place? -----Original Message----- From: Jonathan Marsh [mailto:jmarsh@microsoft.com] Sent: Monday, June 26, 2000 11:51 AM To: 'Lance Otis' Subject: RE: XPointer Functions The official public forum for comments on the XPointer spec is www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org. Please send this message there. XPointer does not provide a function extensibility mechanism at this time. > -----Original Message----- > From: Lance Otis [mailto:lanceo@mail.apptechsys.com] > Sent: Tuesday, June 20, 2000 12:00 PM > To: Jonathan Marsh > Subject: Re: XPointer Functions > > > 1. Background: > We are working on development of a native XML database. > Search operations include > a. finding documents similar to a selected document > b. finding documents based on some phrase embedded in a document > c. finding documents based on a concept where the exact words > in the concept do not need to be in the document > d. general queries based on a query string of tag and element > criteria. > > 2. Discussion: > We do not have direct access to the W3C XPointer committee, > however we would like to suggest that some additional functions be added to the > XPointer spec. You are much more familiar with the spec than > I am. Is there a simple way to provide comments without the need for months > of research on our part? We would like to add some flexibility to the > XPointer spec for document search. > > 3. Question / Recommendation > Can the XPointer spec be changed to include functions such as > similar-to(), find-by-concept(), and find-by-query() with the appropriate arguments? > Your suggestions would be welcomed. > > > //Lance Otis > Chief Scientist > Applied Technical Systems, Inc. > 360-698-7100 x226 >
Received on Tuesday, 27 June 2000 12:41:37 UTC