- From: Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2000 18:21:06 +0200
- To: Dave Hollander <dmh@commerce.net>
- Cc: www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org, "C. M. Sperberg-McQueen" <cmsmcq@acm.org>
On Tue, Mar 14, 2000 at 01:37:53PM -0700, Dave Hollander wrote: > First and foremost, heart-felt congratulations on a well done specification. > It is clear, to the point and easy to read. The terminology issues we were > discussed years ago have been resolved so cleanly that I only once had > to think about the terms used--arc. > > I have two little details to report: > 1) section 1.0, first list after 3rd para: "Create a link database that..." > The words "create" and "database" used this way caused me to stop > and finally say, perhaps they will explain later. > I would suggest something more like: > "Express a link database...". > Like I said, a little point that I expect has already be discussed. > > 2) Section 3.4, para 3: "The URI-reference must be receive XML base..." > > Again, thanks for creating a spec that I can point to as a counter-example > when people are telling me that specs are and need to be hard to read. Dave, thanks a lot for your feedback. Both errors have been corrected in the latest version of the specification (members only): http://www.w3.org/XML/Group/2000/04/WD-xlink-20000418.htm Daniel -- Daniel.Veillard@w3.org | W3C, INRIA Rhone-Alpes | Today's Bookmarks : Tel : +33 476 615 257 | 655, avenue de l'Europe | Linux XML libxml WWW Fax : +33 476 615 207 | 38330 Montbonnot FRANCE | Gnome rpm2html rpmfind http://www.w3.org/People/all#veillard%40w3.org | RPM badminton Kaffe
Received on Wednesday, 14 June 2000 12:21:20 UTC