- From: Josef Dietl <jdietl@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 22 Dec 1999 13:29:31 +0100
- To: "Martin J. Duerst" <duerst@w3.org>, "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: "Paul Grosso" <pgrosso@arbortext.com>, <chairs@w3.org>, <www-xml-linking-comments@w3.org>, <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org>
> -----Original Message----- > From: chairs-request@w3.org [mailto:chairs-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of > Martin J. Duerst [...] > As far as user preference is concerned, it seems that using > graphical selection (setting two points and selecting all the > text that is visually in between these two points) is more > common. Please remember that while the average programmer or > spec writer is good at thinking internally/logically, the > average user thinks much more graphically. which is probably true from the requirements perspective but still doesn't address the fundamental technical problem if there is a lossy transformation in between. Josef
Received on Wednesday, 22 December 1999 07:29:38 UTC