- From: Michael Rys <mrys@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:59:13 -0800
- To: "Arnaud Le Hors" <lehors@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: <www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org>, "W3C XML Query WG" <w3c-xml-query-wg@w3.org>
My apologies. Let me end the third paragraph :-): > In the second case, I personally still dissent but would > accept moving to CR if the concrete example given in the > thread [1] that shows the XSLT behaviour in dealing with > in-scope namespaces is included in. > -----Original Message----- > From: Michael Rys > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 9:37 AM > To: 'Arnaud Le Hors' > Cc: www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org; W3C XML Query WG > Subject: RE: XML Infoset Comment Resolution: issue-query-* > > > Dear Arnaud > > I sent two set of questions: an official one from the Query > WG and a private one that concerns itself with the inscope > namespace property that I feel is superfluous. > > In the first case I have not received any answers or push > back, so I cannot say if I am satisfied since I do not know > how they will be disposed. > > In the second case, I personally still dissent but would > accept moving to CR if the concrete example given in the > thread [1] that shows the XSLT behaviour in dealing with > in-scope namespaces. > > BTW, this behaviour has some important side-effects on the > XML query copy semantics that I am not sure the query group > really understands. > > Best regards > Michael > > [1] > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Member/w3c-xml-query-wg/2001Mar/0349.html > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Arnaud Le Hors [mailto:lehors@us.ibm.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2001 8:55 AM > > To: Michael Rys > > Cc: www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org; W3C XML Query WG > > Subject: Re: XML Infoset Comment Resolution: issue-query-* > > > > > > Michael, > > from reading this thread it isn't absolutely clear to me > that we have > > answered all of your questions to your satisfaction. > > Could you please state whether you (the query WG) agree on > > the XML Core > > WG moving the XML Infoset spec to CR, or if you want to be > recorded as > > dissenting and, if that's the case, on what specific points. > > Thank you. > > -- > > Arnaud Le Hors - Co-chair of XML Core WG > > >
Received on Friday, 30 March 2001 02:59:47 UTC