Re: questions re WD-xml-infoset-20001220

> 1. why don't attributes have a parent?

They have an [owner element] instead.  This corresponds to attributes
not being considered [children] of their elements.

> 2. why are expanded entity references replaced by their string
> equivalent and then marked with start and end markers?

Presumably you mean whay do we do it that way rather than having
entity information items containing the content.

The idea is that the 90% case is to access documents with all the
entities expanded.  It should be *possible* to reconstruct the
entity structure, but it must be *easy* to access the logical structure.

Both these issues are discussed in the XPointer - Infoset liaison
statement, http://www.w3.org/TR/NOTE-xptr-infoset-liaison.

-- Richard

Received on Wednesday, 3 January 2001 10:21:41 UTC