www-xml-infoset-comments@w3.org from January to March 2000 by date

Tuesday, 28 March 2000

• a few typos and text-replacement "editos" Daniel Barclay

Saturday, 4 March 2000

• which infoset is used for c14n? Dan Connolly

Monday, 28 February 2000

• Last Call feedback on XML Infoset cotton@ca.ibm.com

Wednesday, 23 February 2000

• Consistent use of the term 'null' Andrew Layman

Monday, 21 February 2000

• Terminology request Henry S. Thompson

Wednesday, 16 February 2000

• DOM Level 1 Infoset compliance JOrendorff@ixl.com

Tuesday, 1 February 2000

• what kind of grammars are XML,DTD and XSL files Internet User

Monday, 31 January 2000

• Inquirey ulf wiman

Friday, 28 January 2000

• review of Infoset 20 Dec 1999 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen
• comments from XML Schema WG on Infoset 1999-12-20 C. M. Sperberg-McQueen

Wednesday, 26 January 2000

• More comments Nils Klarlund

Monday, 24 January 2000

• Call for unified tree model Nils Klarlund
• declared namespaces and createAttributeNS Jeroen van Rotterdam
• Relationship or Canonical XML to the InfoSet Kay Michael
• Internationalization last call comments on Infoset Martin J. Duerst

Friday, 21 January 2000

• Re: W3C Working Draft 20-December-1999 David McKelvie

Thursday, 20 January 2000

• Version numbers for Infoset and Canonicalization drafts John Cowan

Wednesday, 19 January 2000

• Integration of xml:base and the infoset Jonathan Marsh

Tuesday, 18 January 2000

• XML infoset: please don't Nils Klarlund

Thursday, 13 January 2000

• minor typos in WD-xml-infoset-19991220 Susan Lesch

Tuesday, 11 January 2000

• XML Namespaces to include xml:base functionality Dan Connolly

Tuesday, 4 January 2000

• Various comments on XML Infoset last call Martin J. Duerst

Last message date: Tuesday, 28 March 2000 12:29:25 UTC