W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xml-fragment-comments@w3.org > July 1999

Re: Possibly confusing description in FCS overview

From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 19:00:24 -0500
Message-Id: <>
To: "Sudarshan S. Chawathe" <chaw@cs.umd.edu>
Cc: www-xml-fragment-comments@w3.org
Thank you for your comment.  It does seem that a clarification
could profitably be made in the next draft.  As editor, I'll
put this item on the list of things to consider.


At 19:56 1999 07 29 -0400, you wrote:
>[Reference: http://www.w3.org/1999/06/WD-xml-fragment-19990630.html]
>In the section "Overview of the fcs" is a paragraph that begins
>	The content of the f:fcs element shall be a subtree [...] from
>	the parent document's namespace.
>That sentence and the one following it could be misread (I believe) as
>requiring that an FCS be a complete subtree in the original XML
>document (disallowing the omission of any descendants of that
>subtree's root).  Of course, the examples and the Note at the
>beginning of that section helped clarify the issue.
>Sudarshan S. Chawathe
Received on Thursday, 29 July 1999 20:00:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:07:52 UTC