- From: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Jul 1999 19:00:24 -0500
- To: "Sudarshan S. Chawathe" <chaw@cs.umd.edu>
- Cc: www-xml-fragment-comments@w3.org
Thank you for your comment. It does seem that a clarification could profitably be made in the next draft. As editor, I'll put this item on the list of things to consider. paul At 19:56 1999 07 29 -0400, you wrote: > >[Reference: http://www.w3.org/1999/06/WD-xml-fragment-19990630.html] > >In the section "Overview of the fcs" is a paragraph that begins >thusly: > > The content of the f:fcs element shall be a subtree [...] from > the parent document's namespace. > >That sentence and the one following it could be misread (I believe) as >requiring that an FCS be a complete subtree in the original XML >document (disallowing the omission of any descendants of that >subtree's root). Of course, the examples and the Note at the >beginning of that section helped clarify the issue. > >Regards, > >-- >Sudarshan S. Chawathe >http://www.cs.umd.edu/~chaw/ > > >
Received on Thursday, 29 July 1999 20:00:31 UTC