- From: Joel A. Nava <jnava@Adobe.COM>
- Date: Mon, 26 Apr 1999 14:49:30 -0700
- To: <Daniel.Veillard@w3.org>
- Cc: <www-xml-fragment-comments@w3.org>
From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:Daniel.Veillard@w3.org] > > Restricting it to a known kind of reference allow to anticipate > on the processing needed to handle the fragment on the receiving side. > In the case one use a packaging mechanism, having a strutured > naming scheme is important for the evolution of the specification. > Expressing fragbodyref references as URIs allows to bypass the > packaging mechanism, and provide a standard way to use Fragment > in the absence of a Packaging format. This is useful when the server > has no idea on the client capacity to decode say Mime > multipart messages. Okay, I am convinced. URI reference it is then. -- Joel A. Nava (408)536-6209 Adobe Systems, Inc. jnava@adobe.com
Received on Monday, 26 April 1999 17:49:49 UTC