- From: Thomas Roessler <tlr@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 22 May 2007 17:20:20 +0200
- To: Glenn Marcy <gmarcy@us.ibm.com>
- Cc: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com>, www-xml-canonicalization-comments@w3.org
For the record, the Working Group is (obviously) pleased with the resolution. :) Cheers, -- Thomas Roessler, W3C <tlr@w3.org> On 2007-05-16 10:48:04 -0400, Glenn Marcy wrote: > From: Glenn Marcy <gmarcy@us.ibm.com> > To: Frederick Hirsch <frederick.hirsch@nokia.com> > Cc: www-xml-canonicalization-comments@w3.org > Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:48:04 -0400 > Subject: Re: XMLSec comments and recommended changes to C14N11 specification > List-Id: <www-xml-canonicalization-comments.w3.org> > X-Spam-Level: > X-Archived-At: http://www.w3.org/mid/OF54AE9928.C4023B01-ON852572DD.00510161-852572DD.00514E45@us.ibm.com > X-Bogosity: Ham, tests=bogofilter, spamicity=0.000000, version=1.1.5 > > In response to your email to the Canonical XML 1.1 Last Call Working Draft > recorded at > http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-canonicalization-comments/2007May/0000.html > the XML Core WG generated, discussed, and resolved the follow issue: > > Issue Hirsch-01: > Editorial comments > > Summary resolution: accepted > > Response > -------- > The WG had consensus to accept all of your comments and we have updated > the next draft of the specification to include those changes. > > ======== > > Please let us know whether you accept our resolution of your comment, > or wish to have an objection formally recorded. If we do not hear > from you within 10 days we will assume that you accept our response > (though we would prefer to hear from you in any case if practical). > > Thank you for your interest in Canonical XML 1.1. > > Glenn Marcy > for the XML Core WG
Received on Tuesday, 22 May 2007 15:20:25 UTC