- From: Glenn Marcy <gmarcy@us.ibm.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 10:40:25 -0400
- To: Joseph Reagle <reagle@mit.edu>
- Cc: www-xml-canonicalization-comments@w3.org
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2007 14:40:45 UTC
In response to your email to the Canonical XML 1.1 Last Call Working Draft recorded at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-canonicalization-comments/2006Dec/0001.html the XML Core WG generated, discussed, and resolved the follow issue: Issue Reagle-01: Historical C14N issues Summary resolution: explained Response -------- The WG had consensus that the response given by Paul Grosso at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-canonicalization-comments/2006Dec/0005.html was sufficient to address the comments you had provided. ======== Please let us know whether you accept our resolution of your comment, or wish to have an objection formally recorded. If we do not hear from you within 10 days we will assume that you accept our response (though we would prefer to hear from you in any case if practical). Thank you for your interest in Canonical XML 1.1. Glenn Marcy for the XML Core WG
Received on Wednesday, 16 May 2007 14:40:45 UTC