- From: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2003 08:30:35 -0400
- To: Paul Grosso <pgrosso@arbortext.com>
- Cc: www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org
>In response to your email to the XML 1.1 CR recorded at >http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-xml-blueberry-comments/2002Oct/0003.html >the XML Core WG generated, discussed, and resolved the follow issue: > >Issue Harold-01: >XML 1.1 isn't worth it > >Summary resolution: rejected > >Response >-------- >We agree you have a point, but all in all the W3C came down on the other side >of the decision. >======== > >Please let us know whether you accept our resolution of our comment, >or wish to have an objection formally recorded. If we do not hear >from you within 10 days we will assume that you accept our response >(though we would prefer to hear from you in any case if practical). > My opinion has not changed. I will continue to recommend that people not use XML 1.1. I do not know whether a formal record of my objection is necessary. -- Elliotte Rusty Harold elharo@metalab.unc.edu Processing XML with Java (Addison-Wesley, 2002) http://www.cafeconleche.org/books/xmljava http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN%3D0201771861/cafeaulaitA
Received on Thursday, 3 July 2003 08:46:20 UTC