- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 10:24:26 -0400 (EDT)
- To: ricko@allette.com.au (Rick Jelliffe)
- Cc: www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
Rick Jelliffe scripsit:
> Why not try that minimal solution first, and see if it works?
>
> (And why not do it as a corrigendum rather than 1.1)
I keep telling you why. Because it changes the definition of well-formedness.
A document like "<foo<NEL>bar=baz> is not WF XML 1.0, but it is WF XML 1.1.
--
John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
You tollerday donsk? N. You tolkatiff scowegian? Nn.
You spigotty anglease? Nnn. You phonio saxo? Nnnn.
Clear all so! `Tis a Jute.... (Finnegans Wake 16.5)
Received on Friday, 26 July 2002 10:27:02 UTC