- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2002 14:02:28 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Michael.Kay@softwareag.com (Kay, Michael)
- Cc: pgrosso@arbortext.com (Paul Grosso), mark.scardina@oracle.com (Mark Scardina), w3c-xsl-wg@w3.org, w3c-xml-core-wg@w3.org, www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org
Kay, Michael scripsit: > Are you saying that normalization should be done when producing a final > result tree from the intermediate result trees, or are you saying it should > be done when serializing the final result tree? Either, but I meant the latter. The normalization constraints apply only to actual XML documents used in interchange. What a program does internally to itself is not constrained. It is up to the XSL WG whether to require normalization internally (but I personally recommend against it); what matters is that when you generate an XML 1.1 document, you ensure that it is normalized. -- He made the Legislature meet at one-horse John Cowan tank-towns out in the alfalfa belt, so that jcowan@reutershealth.com hardly nobody could get there and most of http://www.reutershealth.com the leaders would stay home and let him go http://www.ccil.org/~cowan to work and do things as he pleased. --Mencken, _Declaration of Independence_
Received on Tuesday, 27 August 2002 14:06:18 UTC