- From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 08:57:36 -0400 (EDT)
- To: Elliotte Rusty Harold <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- CC: xml-dev@lists.xml.org, www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org
Elliotte Rusty Harold scripsit: > However, the fact remains: every document that was a well-formed XML > 1.0 document was also a well-formed XML 1.0 2nd edition document. Every > document that was not a well-formed XML 1.0 document was also not a > well-formed XML 1.0 2nd edition document. Ditto for validity. Actually, we did change the definition of validity somewhat. For example, it is no longer valid (but still well-formed, of course) to have two attributes of type NOTATION on a single element. -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org One art/there is/no less/no more/All things/to do/with sparks/galore --Douglas Hofstadter
Received on Monday, 23 July 2001 08:57:36 UTC