- From: Ann Navarro <ann@webgeek.com>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 00:02:11 -0400
- To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, Rick Jelliffe <ricko@allette.com.au>
- Cc: www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org, xml-dev@lists.xml.org
At 10:59 PM 7/22/2001 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >We are not talking about not labelling. The issue is: should a document >labelled Blueberry be required to actually exploit at least one Blueberry >feature, or is it all right to take a well-formed XML 1.0 document >and label it Blueberry without further change? Why wouldn't it be ok? Any intersection between the sets of well-formed XML 1.0 documents and XML "Blueberry" documents can be labelled as one or the other, or both (just as a valid document can also be labelled well-formed -- that particular intersection is not mutually exclusive). Ann
Received on Monday, 23 July 2001 00:03:14 UTC