- From: Bullard, Claude L (Len) <clbullar@ingr.com>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 14:04:05 -0500
- To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Cc: Mike.Champion@SoftwareAG-USA.com, xml-dev@lists.xml.org, www-xml-blueberry-comments <www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org>
Yes. They become owners of proprietary solutions just as XML code owners have proprietary solutions and are not second class citizens. They still have a single target. So do others. It isn't the same proprietary product. The W3C isn't the single arbiter of all things markup. Just all things XML. Len http://www.mp3.com/LenBullard Ekam sat.h, Vipraah bahudhaa vadanti. Daamyata. Datta. Dayadhvam.h -----Original Message----- From: John Cowan [mailto:jcowan@reutershealth.com] The existing code will *not* keep working with the privately extended documents, so the people who need these private extensions will be second-class citizens. > *And **the downside is?* The same as the downside of any other proprietary document format. But you knew that.
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2001 15:04:10 UTC