- From: Joel Rees <rees@server.mediafusion.co.jp>
- Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2001 15:07:08 +0900
- To: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu>
- Cc: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>, "www-xml-blueberry-comments" <www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org>
One man's needs are another man's wants. Let me try this again, a little more directly. Maybe someone else can pick up the pieces. I have been assuming that non-name characters are not allowed in tag attributes. If this assumption is wrong, then the following argument is somewhat superfluous, and perhaps the issue of allowing the extension characters in tags can be relegated to questions of convenience. Westerners tend to look at the thousands of characters in Japanese, get mind boggled, and simply assume a direct correlation with the ABCs. But those tens-of-thousands of characters are _not_ the ABCs of Japanese (or Chinese). They are complete syllables and complete root words. The ABCs are the two hundred some-odd radicals that combine to make the rest. I mentioned "mellifluous", "mellyfluous", "mellifluus", and "mellyfluus" in an attempt to demonstrate the effect of dis-allowing the extension characters from markup. The former is a word in current use in English, if rare. The second and third are archaic variants. The fourth is a deliberate misspelling. Should we disallow any of these words from being used as tag attributes? In a simple database, perhaps, yes. "Melodious" would probably be the preferred attribute value, being the more common synonym. As I understand it, XML is aimed at something significantly broader than that kind of value-limited database. Now, if we are going to make a rule that allows non-name characters in attributes, or if we are going to do away with attributes, then you can say that it is all a matter of convenience, and I would have a hard time arguing with that. (I would find myself grumbling from time to time, but grumbling is a feature of life and technology.) Oh. I thought of another way around this issue. It is not presently a very satisfying solution, but may be the ultimate solution, if it would work: Are ideographic sequences allowed in markup (tags and attributes)? I mean sequences of existing characters with the ideographic description characters mixed in to show how they are supposed to combine. If so, some truly sophisticated editor of the future would be able to build virtually any character that can be built from the current set of radicals, and we would be able to do with Japanese the equivalent of using "mellyfluus" (the misspelling) in an attribute. Joel Rees programmer -- rees@mediafusion.co.jp ---------------------------------------------------- To be a tree supporting all information, giving root to the chaos and branches to the trivia, information breathing anew -- This is the aim of Yggdrasill. ============================XML as Best Solution=== Media Fusion Co. ,Ltd. 株式会社メディアフュージョン Amagasaki TEL 81-6-6415-2560 FAX 81-6-6415-2556 Tokyo TEL 81-3-3516-2566 FAX 81-3-3516-2567 http://www.mediafusion.co.jp =================================================== ----- Original Message ----- From: "Elliotte Rusty Harold" <elharo@metalab.unc.edu> To: <xml-dev@lists.xml.org>; "www-xml-blueberry-comments" <www-xml-blueberry-comments@w3.org> Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 6:50 AM Subject: Re: XML Blueberry (non-ASCII name characters in Japan) > At 5:31 PM -0400 7/9/01, John Cowan wrote: > > > >I think that talk of *need* is misconceived; as I said, there is > >no *need* to have Greek, much less Thaana, markup. People *want* > >to use their own language, that's all. Why should the "newer" > >script users be exempt from this desire? > > > > Because satisfying this want is going to cost a lot of other users money and time. That's not necessarily an insurmountable objection, but you've got to show that the benefits outweigh the costs. You can argue about the relative weight that should be assigned to different benefits and costs. You can say that the richer users should absorb the costs for the benefit of the poorer users. (Though IBM for one doesn't seem to believe that since they're very rich, and they still want everybody else to absorb the costs of NEL for them.) > > But before you can make any of these arguments, you've got to show some benefit to what you're proposing, and so far you haven't done that! You've yet to produce a single person from the affected Ethiopic, Burmese, Khmer, etc. communities saying they either want or need this. > -- > > +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ > | Elliotte Rusty Harold | elharo@metalab.unc.edu | Writer/Programmer | > +-----------------------+------------------------+-------------------+ > | The XML Bible, 2nd Edition (Hungry Minds, 2001) | > | http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/books/bible2/ | > | http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ISBN=0764547607/cafeaulaitA/ | > +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ > | Read Cafe au Lait for Java News: http://www.cafeaulait.org/ | > | Read Cafe con Leche for XML News: http://www.ibiblio.org/xml/ | > +----------------------------------+---------------------------------+ > > ------------------------------------------------------------------ > The xml-dev list is sponsored by XML.org, an initiative of OASIS > <http://www.oasis-open.org> > > The list archives are at http://lists.xml.org/archives/xml-dev/ > > To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word > "unsubscribe" in the body to: xml-dev-request@lists.xml.org >
Received on Tuesday, 10 July 2001 02:06:48 UTC