- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 17:30:38 +0100
- To: Stefan Lischke <lischke@googlemail.com>
- CC: www-xkms@w3.org
Check out the PKIX WG page for CMC & CMP [1]. CMC is probably the more popular, though neither protocol is that widely deployed. (Or have things changed?) You could try a p#10 that's unsiged or signed by some other key. I think a lot of products have some way to handle p#10 where the signature doesn't verify. It would be a mistake to get a well-signed p#10 out of the xkms client since then you're getting no benefit from the angle-brackets and shouldn't use X-KRSS (you can still benefit from X-KISS later of course), S. [1] http://www.ietf.org/html.charters/pkix-charter.html Stefan Lischke wrote: > Hi Stephen, > > Cause many Trustcenters only have simple HTTP p#10 web-interfaces. You > send a p#10 request and get a signed certificate with p#7. So > unfortunatly i have to use this format ;-( > So any Ideas? > > btw. i'm new to all this security stuff, can you please explain CMS/CMP. > Google won't help me with these abbreviations. ;-) > > Stefan > > Stephen Farrell schrieb: >> Why p#10 out of the xkms server? Using CMC (or even CMP) >> would be more appropriate. >> >> Stephen. >> >> Stefan Lischke wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> I have a question about the following use-case. Does anyone has any >>> experiences or maybe done the same or has any ideas. >>> >>> An XKMS-Client sends an XKRSS-RegisterRequest for certification of an >>> already created key-pair. This RegisterRequest is signed with the >>> private key with XMLSig at the Client. Now this Request needs to be >>> transformed to a PKCS10 Request at the XKMS-Server. But the PKCS10 >>> Request must also be signed, but the XKMS-Server does not have the >>> private key. >>> >>> Any Ideas? >>> >>> * Maybe send a sign-Request to the XKMS-Client to sign the created >>> PKCS10? >>> * Is there a way of sending PKCS10 Data inside XKMS? >>> >>> thanx in advance for any help or suggestion >>> >>> Stefan >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> > > >
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2007 16:29:10 UTC