Re: Issue in spec examples

>Maybe I missed it, but so far only the interop examples are for
>download? Would it be a good idea to make the xml examples in the
>spec downloadable, too?

There is no explicit link to the spec samples but they are somewhere in the
mail archive.  You will have to involve Jose if you want them referenced
from within the W3C XKMS home.

Regards
Tommy

On 2/14/06, Martin Pirker <Martin.Pirker@iaik.tugraz.at> wrote:
>
> Tommy Lindberg wrote:
> > You are right - thanks for reporting this.  This is my mistake and I
> > will produce updated sample bundles.
>
> Maybe I missed it, but so far only the interop examples are for
> download? Would it be a good idea to make the xml examples in the
> spec downloadable, too?
>
>
> > Are the following values what you get in the two cases respectively and
> > in the order you refer to them in your message:
> >
> > Is:
> > First pass revocation code =  PHx8li2SUhrJv2e1DyeWbGbD6rs=
> > Second pass revocation code = 5AEAai06hFJEkuqyDyqNh8k/u3M=
> >
> > Should be:
> >
> > First pass revocation code = HAhXyVRYwm9EMn79DvBVsIytXHg=
> > Second pass revocation code = 5rRN2cOZiMlciJxBqaelrZDCzSE=
>
> ok
>
> > Is:
> > First pass revocation code = Ben38d3ved3FOSxgWw/B5anHM2o=
> > Second pass revocation code = TD4zyGKCIHCJgKk4i+BUN1HFXWE=
> >
> > Should be:
> >
> > First pass revocation code = pdIcyMGh9VPIx6W80Www1mlsRA4=
> > Second pass revocation code = tfmE05IHHuxTv3OT3WgHA5gnyLI=
>
> this appears correct, too
>
>
> Thanks for fixing - if I find more and I'm sure it's not my
> programming fault I'll report again :-)
>
> Regards,
> Martin
>
>
>
>