Re: Schema Issue

Rich Salz wrote:

 > This would be nice, but I don't see it as a MUST for moving forward.
 > Much of the semantics are already embedded in the prose. :)
 >     /r$

I agree. Good thing to add to a "to-do" list whenever we start
editing the schema again.

S.

Received on Tuesday, 24 May 2005 14:24:20 UTC