- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Mon, 23 May 2005 12:47:28 +0100
- To: Kenneth Jensen <xmlsec@gmail.com>
- Cc: jose.kahan@w3.org, www-xkms@w3.org
No - we actually re-invented TLS:-) Good catch, Stephen. Kenneth Jensen wrote: > In the Bindings document, it implies that TLS is short for > "Transaction Layer Security". > (in table [71] and in headline 4.2). > > Assuming it refers to the TLS protocol described in RFC2246, the > correct name would be "Transport Layer Security". :-) > > Cheers, > Kenneth > > > > On 4/20/05, Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>I finished updating the changelog and did my final edits to part-2[1]. >>Don't hesitate to send mail if you find something that needs fixing. >>We still have some time. >> >>You'll find here below a changelog of things I did since my previous >>message. >> >>[1] >> >> >>http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-PR-PUB/PR-PUB-xkms-part-2.html >> >>[X] Updated changelog in a style similar to that of part-1 >> >>[X] After verifying the Soap 1.2 and 1.1 specs, removed the >> trailing '/' after "http://www.w3.org/2003/05/soap-envelope" and >> checked that it was included in >> "http://schemas.xmlsoap.org/soap/envelope/". >> >> >>BodyID:5872384.2.n.logpart (stored separately) >> >> > > >
Received on Monday, 23 May 2005 11:43:29 UTC