- From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Jan 2005 17:50:19 +0100
- To: www-xkms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20050112165019.GA11063@inrialpes.fr>
Hello, Following my AI from yesterday's meeting, I compiled a draft summary of results[1] and linked it to the XKMS home page. X-KISS testing is almost done, both X-KRSS and Compound testing needs more work. Optional tests are done (unless we add the stringprep one). Our exit criteria required having two client implementations and two server implementations for the non-optional attributes and only one client and one server implementation for the optional ones. In yesterday's meeting, we decided that to give further interoperability proof we should have at least two clients being succesful against each server and, when possible, have a same client contact two servers. (I'll check with the QA people to see if it's ok if we don't always have the same client contacting two servers if we give a valid reason (like lack of time)). I added some comments and notes. In particular: - Yunhao, I didn't take into account the results of your client against your own server, as we thought it would be more fair to only include tests done against other servers when people had both a client and server. Could you update your report and choose "not applicable" or something similar, like Tommy did in the column referring to his server? - I considered that a server passed a test when a client reported success against it. When this wasn't the case, I couldn't tell if the server supported that feature. - In some cases a developer reported success and another one failure when testing against the same server (e.g., XKRSS-T1). You should get in touch to see if the problem came from a misunderstanding of the spec or of the test. - We apparently only have one server implementing XKISS-T17, XKISS-T18, and XKRSS-T9. Yunhao, is there a possibility that could support those tests and if yes, could you give some estimation of when it could get done? Thanks everybody for their hard work so far. We're almost done. -jose [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/test-suite/CR-XKMS-Summary.html
Received on Wednesday, 12 January 2005 16:50:57 UTC