Re: XKMS 2: errata: X.509 DNs not in RFC 2253 format

Hi Tommy and Stephen,

I think that this errata consists of the regenerated examples, or am I
wrong? If it's the case, I'll just mark it down and wait until Tommy has
time to regenerate the examples.

Thanks!

-jose

On Mon, Oct 17, 2005 at 10:03:31AM +0100, Tommy Lindberg wrote:
> > I don't know if Tommy generated those, or just inherited them?
> 
> I inherited them. I'll see what I can do about that.

Received on Thursday, 15 December 2005 10:44:49 UTC