Re: wrong link

Hi,

Thanks for the link correction Guillermo. I updated it in both part-1 and
part-2.

-jose

On Sat, Apr 23, 2005 at 01:33:14PM +0100, Guillermo ?lvaro Rey wrote:
> 
> Link to RFC2119 (in paragraph [392]) links in fact to a different one
> (RFC2118).

Received on Monday, 25 April 2005 12:16:50 UTC