Re: Part 2 Spec updated

Hi Shivaram and folks,

The part-2 publishing version is almost ready[1]. I just need to update the
changelog to finish the changes. All the <ins> and <del> have been
pruned out.

Shivaram,

I took the freedom to update the TLS tables using the info we had
discussed yesterday. Feel free to contact me if you want some other
change.

You'll find here below a changelog of things I'd to do.

[1]
http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-PR-PUB/PR-PUB-xkms-part-2.html


----------------------
To Do:
----------------------

Part-2

[ ] Updated changelog in a style similar to that of part-1

----------
Done:
--------------

[X] Verified links and valid XHTML

[X] Removed xhtml:ins/xhtml:del

[X] Removed WSDL ref. from the reference section (not quoted in this document)

[X] Added cell borders to the tables, to simplify their reading. Removed superflous
    colspan and rowspan = "1". Added thead.

[X] Named first row of table p. [71] "Feature"

[X] p. [74a] In the DoS TLS entry, substituted  the text that said 
       "TLS service is subject to DoS [check this]" 
    and put instead
      "TLS has no specific countermeasures against denial of service attacks"

[X] Some table entries had or didn't have periods at the end. Removed/added them
    according to the context, to make it homogeneous

[X] Added non applicable and any to table 74a, to make it similar to table 71b.

[X] Some cleaning on the ref.s section (adding spaces, homogenization, ...)

[X] Cleaned the XML schema ref. entries to point to the 2nd. Edition of
    the recommendation (it's no longer a draft)

[X] p. [14].  Updated the link pointing to section 1.2 of part-1.
    (will have to do it when publishing again)

[X] Deleted part-2 ack. section and copied part-1 ack appendix to Appendix B.
    Moved Changelog to Appendix C

[X] Update the status of document section and copyright

------
Part-1.
--------

[X] Add Payload Security term definition ton Section 1.2

[X] Cleaned the XML schema ref. entries to point to the 2nd. edition of the
    recommendation (it's no longer a draf)t

[X] Ask Shiv. if in p. 134 the wording shouldn't be:
   In the case of a non-compound request, the operation that completed s/is with/has/ 
   status Success. 
   --> change done.

[X] Ask Shiv. why there are some items with '*' in the table below [104].
    --> added p. [104a] to say that * means one or more.

[X] Supress the previous changelog info