- From: Tommy Lindberg <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
- Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 22:36:30 +0100
- To: jose.kahan@w3.org
- Cc: Shivaram Mysore <shivarammysore@yahoo.com>, XKMS WG <www-xkms@w3.org>
Yes you are right, my intention was to, not allow RespondWith elements that are direct children of a CompoundRequest element. Regards Tommy On Apr 11, 2005 2:50 PM, Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org> wrote: > Hi Shivaram, > > When taking into account Tommy's issue, you added the following > text for CompoundStatements: > > [128a]The RespondWith element MUST NOT be present inside a CompoundRequest > element. > > I think that Tommy's original intention was to be more explicit. If > RespondWith appears in the CompoundRequest, but not in the inner > requests, where it applies to all the inner requests or not. Or to say > that in a CompoundRequest, RespondWith can only appear in the appropriate > inner requests. > > The way you worded, it seems to say that RespondWith cannot appear > anywhere inside a CompoundRequest. > > Did I read it wrong? > > -jose > > >
Received on Monday, 11 April 2005 21:36:33 UTC