- From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:52:38 +0200
- To: www-xkms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20050408145238.GE31009@rakahanga.inrialpes.fr>
All the items are closed except for the first two. I commited the changes already. While waiting for you and Tommy's feedback, I'll start working on part-2. -jose [ ] 2.5.3.3 The spec doesn't specify how to send notifications. This example is misleading. Tommy proposes the following text (and I like it): "The XKMS service notifies the client about the completion of the request processing using the notification mechanism specified in the <PendingNotification> element in the initial request". Do we need an example where there's no <PendingNotification>? What should the client behavior be in that case? Polling? What does the spec. say (I couldn't find the answer). We may need an example which gives <PendingNotification> explicitly. [ ] Update the changelog to reflect all but the minor edits I applied [X] p. [125] Vamsi: The "ds:signature/ds:signatureValue" representation format syntax should be replaced by a textual description for consistancy. Changed to: The content of the <ds:SignatureValue> element used in the request does not match the content of the <RequestSignatureValue> element in the response. [X] Homogeneize XKISS and XKRSS Sometimes the spec uses X-KISS, sometimes XKISS. Same thing for XKRSS. Used X-KISS and X-KRSS throughout [X] [404] Fix font face for URL [X] Appendix B move to non normative. [X] 122 TooManyResponses missing a nbsp; [X] Tables at p. [120] and [122] The anyURI prefix description looks ugly. Move it to the preceding par. [X] Table at [122]. Use of Sender or Receiver for the last three minor codes Tommy proposes Sender. The text in the spec is not synch. with the actual values. See [213], [311], [315], Following a mail exchange with Tommy on the list, and with Shivaram's approval, modified as follows: OptionalElementNotSupported Receiver ProofOfPosessionRequired Sender TimeInstantNotSupported Receiver TimeInstantOutofRange Sender --> related par. updated. [X] Par. [373a] is missing some articles, but I'm unable to fix it without knowing what was it supposed to say originally. Fixed with Shivaram [X] 124 and 125 add <span class="ID> as needed.
Received on Friday, 8 April 2005 14:52:42 UTC