- From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 8 Apr 2005 16:52:38 +0200
- To: www-xkms@w3.org
- Message-ID: <20050408145238.GE31009@rakahanga.inrialpes.fr>
All the items are closed except for the first two. I commited the changes
already.
While waiting for you and Tommy's feedback, I'll start working on part-2.
-jose
[ ] 2.5.3.3
The spec doesn't specify how to send notifications. This example is
misleading.
Tommy proposes the following text (and I like it):
"The XKMS service notifies the client about the completion of the
request processing using the notification mechanism specified in the
<PendingNotification> element in the initial request".
Do we need an example where there's no <PendingNotification>? What
should the client behavior be in that case? Polling? What does the
spec. say (I couldn't find the answer).
We may need an example which gives <PendingNotification> explicitly.
[ ] Update the changelog to reflect all but the minor edits I applied
[X] p. [125]
Vamsi: The "ds:signature/ds:signatureValue" representation format syntax
should be replaced by a textual description for consistancy.
Changed to:
The content of the <ds:SignatureValue> element used in the request does not
match the content of the <RequestSignatureValue> element in the response.
[X] Homogeneize XKISS and XKRSS
Sometimes the spec uses X-KISS, sometimes XKISS. Same thing for XKRSS.
Used X-KISS and X-KRSS throughout
[X] [404] Fix font face for URL
[X] Appendix B move to non normative.
[X] 122 TooManyResponses missing a nbsp;
[X] Tables at p. [120] and [122]
The anyURI prefix description looks ugly. Move it to the preceding par.
[X] Table at [122]. Use of Sender or Receiver for the last three minor codes
Tommy proposes Sender. The text in the spec is not synch. with the
actual values. See [213], [311], [315],
Following a mail exchange with Tommy on the list, and with Shivaram's approval,
modified as follows:
OptionalElementNotSupported Receiver
ProofOfPosessionRequired Sender
TimeInstantNotSupported Receiver
TimeInstantOutofRange Sender
--> related par. updated.
[X] Par. [373a] is missing some articles, but I'm unable to fix it
without knowing what was it supposed to say originally.
Fixed with Shivaram
[X] 124 and 125 add <span class="ID> as needed.
Received on Friday, 8 April 2005 14:52:42 UTC