Misc editorial

Hi Jose -

The figures in [154] and [237] contain markup pertaining to the
initial XKMS submission that is no longer valid - Query, KeyID,
Prototype and AuthInfo.  This may have been pointed out before.

The <Result> fragment in 2.5.3.3 is lacking a Service attribute.

The table in paragraph [122] has entries for the ResultMinor codes
ProofOfPossessionRequired, TimeInstantNotSupported and
TimeInstantOutOfRange that specifies the ResultMajor code Receiver to
be used.  This is inconsistent with the text in [311], [315] and [213]
which indicate that a ResultMajor code of Sender must be used.  At the
time, I thought that Sender would be appropriate for all.

Unrelated to this, I will submit an updated sample set in a day or two.

Regards,
Tommy

Received on Tuesday, 5 April 2005 22:21:02 UTC