Re: Issue with compound request

Sorry about that, Guillermo. I checked the issues list - I should have
checked the archive too.

Regards
Tommy

----- Original Message -----
From: Guillermo Álvaro Rey <alvarorg@cs.tcd.ie>
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 14:24:23 +0100
Subject: Re: Issue with compound request
To: Tommy Lindberg <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
Cc: www-xkms@w3.org

 Hi Tommy and all,
 
 I had pointed out this issue but found no response. I agree with you
that either the schema should be updated to allow PendingRequests in a
CompoundRequest or that the sentece should be removed from the
specification.
 
 My client currently follows the schema but changes could be done if
the schema was going to be modified.
 
 Regards,
 - -Guillermo
 
 El mar, 28-09-2004 a las 12:23, Tommy Lindberg escribió: 


 In the process of trying to get my head around the compound messaging
and I discovered what I believe is an inconsistency in the spec. The
last senctence in Section 2.8, which goes like this: "Alternatively a
client MAY issue a compound request containing multiple inner pending
requests corresponding to requests which were originally made
independently." is in conflict with both the schema and also with text
elsewhere in the spec - PendingRequests's are not allowed in a
CompoundRequest. If this feature is required then the schema needs to
be updated otherwise we'll get away with removing the offending
sentence. Regards Tommy

Received on Tuesday, 28 September 2004 13:32:01 UTC