- From: Guillermo Álvaro Rey <alvarorg@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Wed, 27 Oct 2004 18:45:40 +0100
- To: www-xkms@w3.org
Hi, As the Interoperability Status Report paper will show the current implementations, it would be nice to reflect also if they are commercial applications or intended to be published as open source. Suggestions about the notation ["intended open source"/"commercial"] are welcome... And could you guys check that the implementation names do satisfy you also? :) Implementation Client Server Type Trinity College Dublin YES NO intended open source Tommy Lindberg YES YES intended open source Entrust Inc. YES YES commercial Oracle Corporation YES NO commercial Apache Software Foundation YES YES intended open source DataPower Technology, Inc. YES NO commercial SQLData Systems YES YES intended open source Cheers, - -Guillermo
Received on Wednesday, 27 October 2004 17:45:42 UTC