- From: Shivaram Mysore <shivarammysore@yahoo.com>
- Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 17:26:50 -0700 (PDT)
- To: XKMS WG <www-xkms@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <20041026002650.99430.qmail@web51502.mail.yahoo.com>
Folks, Both part 1 & 2 of the XKMS spec has been updated. Thanks to Tommy for the samples. In this update, the following are fixed in part 1 of the spec - http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-PR-DRAFT/PR-DRAFT-xkms-part-1.html Fixed example in section C3.2.1 Fixed example in section C3.2.2 Fixed example in section C3.2.3 Fixed Para [269] with the correct example values The following are fixed in part 2 of the spec - http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/XKMS-PR-DRAFT/PR-DRAFT-xkms-part-2.html Fixed Para[50] LocateRequest- SOAP12 - Updated to use URIs instead of QNames Fixed Para[51] LocateResult- SOAP12 - Updated With these, the following issues are completely fixed: 315-ga-3 - Typo in example 318-tl : Missing RSAKeyPair element in the XKMS schema 326-jk : Using a neutral XKMS service in the examples 317-bl: Make a requirement that signatures in a message actually refer to the XKMS content - Fixed section 10.11 which has the necessary clarification (Fixed Aug 20th Draft) 326-jk : Using a neutral XKMS service in the examples To be fixed: 322-tl 323-ga : StatusResult atts 324-tl : RespondWith and OCSP - check with Stephen on this 325-ga : Unbounded or Opaque (Client) Data /Shivaram __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com
Received on Tuesday, 26 October 2004 00:27:21 UTC