- From: Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@cs.tcd.ie>
- Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2004 14:52:21 +0100
- To: jose.kahan@w3.org
- Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Probably a good idea. I prefer your first alternative since www.example.org exists and refers to rfc2606 whereas the 2nd one just gives a dns error. FWIW, xmltrustcenter.org was a place where VeriSign put copies of specs etc. prior to the WG starting so I guess the chances of them complaining or of the domain changing hands are both v. small. I just looked for the 1st time in ages and the front page there is quite out of date so again the change is probably a good idea. Stephen. Jose Kahan wrote: > In part-1 of the spec, many examples quote an XKMS service called > > http://test.xmltrustcenter.org/XKMS > > I propose that we change this to something more neutral like > > http://www.example.org/XKMS > > or > > http://xkms.example.org/ > > To avoid having fallback if ever the real owners of that domain (which > is registered), complain to us. > > -jose >
Received on Tuesday, 12 October 2004 13:50:04 UTC