- From: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2004 22:36:50 -0400 (EDT)
- To: "Hallam-Baker, Phillip" <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Cc: 'Berin Lautenbach' <berin@wingsofhermes.org>, "www-xkms@w3.org" <www-xkms@w3.org>
> I beleive that the spec is correct as currently specified, but > Qnames are a schema feature that need to be depricated so it > would be useful to move to URIs if that is viable. Yes, the spec is correct. I was wrong when I agreed with the belief that it was wrong. :) (It's correct because Schema validation happens after the validator expands the qname, and compares that expansion to the list of expanded enumerations that it maintains.) And yes, I think we should move to URI's. After all, WS-Sec did it late in the game, so I think we can do it, too. :) -- Rich Salz Chief Security Architect DataPower Technology http://www.datapower.com XS40 XML Security Gateway http://www.datapower.com/products/xs40.html XML Security Overview http://www.datapower.com/xmldev/xmlsecurity.html
Received on Wednesday, 7 July 2004 22:37:01 UTC