- From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 5 Feb 2004 19:26:16 +0100
- To: Shivaram Mysore <Shivaram.Mysore@Sun.COM>
- Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Hello! We're now juggling with schedules to arrange a meeting with the Director. For the Soap 1.2 recommended/required point that we discussed yesterday, if we don't get a decision, we can continue talking with the XMLP WG or invite one of their representatives to the meeting with the Director. We'll know better our position in our next teleconf. There are two other remaining points that must be solved in time for the meeting: - Last call issue page [1]. Steve asked us to clean up a bit the page: - either remove or follow the instructions that are given in the second paragraph that stars with: "This page will contain two tables. Outstanding issues are recorded in the first table. They are typed as either Editorial..." These instructions were followed in the general issues page [2], but not here, so it's confusing. - The red text appears at the end of some paragraphs, but not througout. This is confusing. Shivaram, or Stephen, could you do these modifications? - Mailing list for getting the CR comments: Sorry for bringing this back, but I got some additional feedback. Here's my proposal - We can have a dedicated mailing list and archive called public-xkms-comments@w3.org with everyone on the WG subscribed to it automatically (thru a symlink). Benefits: all the comments and answers are in a single place, no extra traffic to the WG list. - We can use the www-xkms@w3.org mailing list. Benefits: a single list Drawbacks: comment traffic will be mixed up with other WG mail. - Making public-xkms-comments an alias that points to the www-xkms mailing list or adding "mail the editor + Cc: the editor" are confusing and we were advised to avoid going that way. Which one do you prefer? Personally, I feel more inclined for having a separate mailing list. What is more comfortable for you? Thanks! -jose
Received on Thursday, 5 February 2004 13:26:38 UTC