W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-xkms@w3.org > December 2004


From: Tommy Lindberg <tommy.lindberg@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 6 Dec 2004 00:14:06 +0000
Message-ID: <18ec59cc041205161411623832@mail.gmail.com>
To: XKMS WG <www-xkms@w3.org>

How is the shared secret "holder" in an NotBoundAuthentication intended to be

Apart from altering the schema (adding a "Name" attribute) the only
reasonable option seems to be, to combine these two pieces of
information and include their base64 encoding in the Value attribute.

For example, a protocol defined out of scope to XKMS and identified by the URI
urn:example-protocol:username-password specifies that the Value
attribute carries
a username/password pair separated by a ':'  would take the form of
the following
instance fragment


Received on Monday, 6 December 2004 00:14:38 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:31:43 UTC