- From: GUILLERMOALVARO <GUILLERMOALVARO@terra.es>
- Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2004 18:59:15 +0100
- To: www-xkms@w3.org
Hi all, As it's been discussed in today's teleconference, my opinion about the 'Double definition of "ResponseId" attribute (315-ga-2)' issue [1] is the following one: The reference to the Optional "ResponseId" attribute in the <StatusRequest> element (par[132]) description in [2] has to be removed to be consistent with the Schema [3]. In this schema the <StatusRequest> element is defined as an extention of "PendingRequestType" but the "ResponseId" attribute is not mentioned. The Schema is OK as it is because the parent element already has that attribute as "required" so, in my opinion, it would make no sense to change it as "optional" in the child. [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/cr-issues/issues.html#315-ga-2 [2] http://www.w3.org/TR/xkms2/ [3] http://www.w3.org/TR/xkms2/Schemas/xkms.xsd Regards, - -Guillermo Álvaro Rey
Received on Tuesday, 27 April 2004 14:58:42 UTC