- From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 2 Apr 2004 19:06:00 +0200
- To: Rich Salz <rsalz@datapower.com>
- Cc: www-xkms@w3.org
Hello Rich, Thanks for your time doing this. On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 02:52:04PM -0500, Rich Salz wrote: > Jose Kahan wrote: > > As I understand, the PER is basically the errata merged into the 1st > edition schema documents. Is that correct? Yes. I checked with Michael. > I read the complete errata. While there is lots of discussion on base64 > canonical form (no whitespace), and the open-interval nature of dates > and timestamps, I could find nothing in the errata document that would > be an issue for XKMS. That's great! I sent your reply to the PER mailing list on behalf of the XKMS WG. We're all set! Thanks again! -jose
Received on Friday, 2 April 2004 12:08:24 UTC