- From: Hallam-Baker, Phillip <pbaker@verisign.com>
- Date: Fri, 21 Nov 2003 07:43:42 -0800
- To: "'jose.kahan@w3.org'" <jose.kahan@w3.org>, www-xkms@w3.org
I have no problem with that, one of my main frustrations with managing the list has been the lack of a tool. It would be nice if the tool were open source and could be used for other standards droups as well (IETF, OASIS) I would like to avoid having to learn multiple tools. Phill > -----Original Message----- > From: Jose Kahan [mailto:jose.kahan@w3.org] > Sent: Thursday, November 20, 2003 11:47 AM > To: www-xkms@w3.org > Subject: Small suggestion for improving the XKMS issue list > > > > Phil, > > While working on the request to move to CR, I wanted to > quote how many issues we have solved. I went to [1] and > realized that this page is hard to consult. If I want > to know if a given issue was solved, I've to follow a > link and parse thru a mail. If I want to know how many > issues were sent, open, or close at one time, I've > to count them by hand. > > Sometimes there are comments in red that say "Fixed" > and sometimes not (eg #305, #304, #307). When a given issue > is not closed, it's moved out, like in issue #312. > > An issue tracking page I really like is the DOM one [2]. > PLH uses an XML file and a script to produce the page. > What's really nice IMO is that it gives a good view of the > status of each issue and the answer to each issue. I can > look at how PLH's system works now and install it for us. > > In all cases, I think that it would be useful to break the > grouping of issues in a single table cell and use rather > one row per issue. > > [1] http://www.w3.org/2001/XKMS/Drafts/xkms-spec-lastcall-issues.html > [2] http://www.w3.org/2002/10/DOM-Level-3-Val-issues/all.html > > -jose >
Received on Friday, 21 November 2003 10:46:02 UTC