- From: John Ibbotson <john_ibbotson@uk.ibm.com>
- Date: Tue, 13 May 2003 16:10:07 +0100
- To: pbaker@verisign.com
- Cc: www-xkms@w3.org, w3c-xml-protocol-wg@w3.org
The following comments are in response to the XKMS WG Last Call request to the XML Protocol WG. 1. Section 3 SOAP Binding para [41] The paragraph includes the sentences: "Use of SOAP 1.1 is REQUIRED by implementers in the near term for compatibility with existing tools and infrastructures. Use of SOAP 1.2 is Recommended." The XKMS requirements document includes the requirement that : XKMS services MUST implement SOAP 1.2 once that specification has achieved Candidate Recommendation status. SOAP 1.2 has now reached Proposed Recommendation status so we ask the XKMS WG to state that the use of SOAP 1.2 is REQUIRED by implementers. In addition, SOAP 1.1 is W3C Note which has an informal status. The XKMS specification should reflect this. We suggest the sentences above be changed to: "Use of SOAP 1.2 is REQUIRED by implementers of this specification. For near term compatibility with existing tools and infrastructure, SOAP 1.1 MAY be used" 2. Section 3.1.1 SOAP 1.2 Binding The example XKMS Request and Response messages in paras [45] and [46] are syntactically incorrect - there is no termination for the env:Header element. Similar errors exist in the examples in paras [54] and [55]. Apart from this, we have no further comments. John Emerging ebusiness Industry Architecture , XML Technology and Messaging, IBM UK Ltd, Hursley Park, Winchester, SO21 2JN
Received on Wednesday, 14 May 2003 03:08:21 UTC