- From: Jose Kahan <jose.kahan@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:47:03 +0200
- To: www-xkms@w3.org
- Cc: ij@w3.org
FYI, You'll find here belowe Ian's IRC notes. The links he quoted are in them, cited in context. Ian, Thanks for your help! -jose <Ian> IJ jots down some topics: <Ian> - Test suite expectations <Ian> - Evaluation tools? <Ian> - Existing implementation reports <Ian> - Transitions doc <Ian> - Other exit criteria <Ian> Issues responded to, all closed. <Ian> 1) Document expectations about new or evolving implementations. <Ian> (as well as current) <Ian> 2) Level of detail of these evaluations. <Ian> SOAP <Ian> The SOAP folks did a per-feature evaluation <Ian> Summarizing: <Ian> 1) Identify features <Ian> 2) Identify which ones implemented <Ian> 3) Identify at-risk features <Ian> 4) Revise table to show all have been implemented twice. <Ian> (matrix) <Ian> http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/WebOnt/rqim.html <Ian> Test suites? <Ian> Link between tests and documentation of which features have been implemented. <Ian> [Talk to QA folks] <Ian> In any case, discuss how testing handled. <Ian> interop events? <Ian> Other things to boost interop case? <Ian> http://www.w3.org/2003/05/Transitions <jose> a document mapping the requirement documents and the actual changes to those requirements if they happened <Ian> http://www.w3.org/2003/06/09-dom-core-issues/issues.html <Ian> Summarizing: <Ian> 1) IDentify features <Ian> 2) Identify features at risk <Ian> 3) Two complete implementations or two implementations of each feature? <Ian> (or identify "core" features that every implementation must do) <Ian> 4) Follow the transitions doc
Received on Wednesday, 13 August 2003 12:47:06 UTC